Summary of Episode 2 and Notice of Episode 3

Analyzing the Fed's power

This post is to let subscribers know that Episode 2 ("A Government Unto Itself") in The War for Bankocracy series has been published (two weeks ago, actually, mea culpa for only now getting around to this late announcement); and also to let subscribers know that Episode 3 ("The Fed Independence Lie") will be available tonight at 7 pm ET. (Updated link to follow…)

Episode 2 can be found at any of these bulleted links:

• https://beta.solari.com/the-war-for-bankocracy/ (scroll down to EPISODE II)

•

• https://www.bitchute.com/video/y-fPI_tleUo

The first episode in the series, "Warning Shot," demonstrated that the most controversial statement in The Biden White House memo--namely, that nearly all advanced economies "are governed by independent central banks"--is wrong as a matter of law due to the U.S. Constitution. Because sovereign powers in the U.S. are delegated across three branches of government, the Federal Reserve doesn't "govern" anything in the U.S. beyond what powers Congress delegated the Fed in the Federal Reserve Act.

On that score: the Fed controls every dollar it issues as Federal Reserve notes--cash--and it exerts enormous control over all $17.5 trillion in bank deposits. And all of that is quite aside from the control that the Fed exercises over retail banks as their top regulator. For all intents and purposes, the Fed controls the U.S. money supply.

The question of the Fed's power thus becomes, where does monetary control and the power of money issuance rank among other sovereign powers like raising standing armies and issuing laws?

The answer, at least since 1694, is #1. Specifically, the power to coin money has been the apex sovereign power in nations since 1694, when the creation of the Bank of England introduced private money issuance at the sovereign level to the world. It was this development that caused money-coining to surpass the raising of standing armies as the apex sovereign power.

Before 1694, as Niccolo Machiavelli had it, "men and steel could find money and bread," but not vice versa. In other words, so long as soldiers could find monied men, soldiers were top dog. That founding of the Bank of England in 1694 changed that dynamic forever, however. Affirming the tectonic power shift that took place after 1694, Thomas Jefferson wrote that "banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies."

Episode 2 traces that massive power shift to two crucial features of the Bank of England when it was founded in 1694--features that took Machiavelli's reasoning off the table: first was the Bank of England's private and anonymous ownership, second its issuance of debt-based money.

Importantly, the episode points out, the Federal Reserve replicates both of those features.

Thankfully, however, there are limits on the Fed's power in the U.S. The Constitution, written in 1787 following a long war with England largely over the right to coin money, put the money-coining power in the hands of directly elected representatives, i.e., in congress. Thus even today, the Fed's claim to "independent" status is not any stronger than a renter in possession of a home posing as its owner, as pointed out in the last episode.

There is thus enormous tension within the U.S. power structure: as a factual matter, the apex sovereign power of money-coining rests in the hands of privately owned banks; but that power is only rented.

In the U.S., the Fed--undeniably powerful though it is--cannot achieve sovereign status due to the Constitution. The European Central Bank, by way of contrast, is the legal owner of its apex sovereign power and thus is the ranking sovereign power in Europe.

Nevertheless, despite its legally subordinate status, the Fed acts "as a government to itself" by repeatedly thumbing its nose at congress, its creator. The question is how far the Fed is willing to go in order to extend its power--legally or otherwise?

A good answer can be found by closely scrutinizing the Fed's argument for independence based on the facts, which is actually not an argument at all but something else entirely--and is the subject of the next episode.

N.B.: Episode 2 includes a short “Previously on the War for Bankocracy” at the front of the episode. I really, really hope you like it, because I worked on it a ton knowing that it’s gonna bat leadoff for every episode from now until the end of the series!