Thank you John. Very clearly presented, as usual. I learned a great deal in this first installment. You have a knack for cutting through the obfuscation. The complexity is always meant to confuse. Thank you for simplifying this.
I'm sure you've read this before but I just have to repeat it because my belief that central banking is truly pernicious and evil. Debt is a four letter word and the work of the devil which should be used with extreme caution.
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money." (Said to be from an informal talk by Josiah Stamp at the University of Texas in the 1920s)
Backed and part of bloodline/aristocracy he schooled/educated and unleashed the furious five on first Europe. Nathan (England) and James (France) the loudest of the five.
John, tell us WHY the politicians don't help us get rid of this curse, it is $, extortion, fear of assassination, allegiance to a secret society? This will help us know that the political system will never help us, which is what many of us believe.
fwiw- in Bill Still's The Money Masters documentary (made in the late 90s), I'm pretty sure he said that most US politicians don't even understand the Federal Reserve and the monetary system. Dr Ron Paul was the only one who appeared on camera. I think there was one other congress person who understood, but was too afraid to be interviewed.
Some may not have known, most play dumb I’m sure. How hard is it to understand, “have the right to lend currency of no value and charge the principal and interest on it.”?
There is so much more at risk here......... With CBDC's being promoted by the Fed, they are advocation for a select class of elites, exclusive and absolute control over the Right to Life of all Earth citizens. Further, a powerful Constitutional issue conflicts with the Fed's ultimate desires: RESTRAINT of TRADE. As I understand it, the Fed and World Banks desire to impose all electronic currency only, and will secure for them, free, unlimited access to the produced wealth of the People for ever, keeping them in power forever. What do you think, Good Sir? Kind Regards, FMR Intelligence Officer
Been awhile but nice to see you back. The Central Bank definition in the Federal Reserve Act is specific for Account Holders in Federal Reserve Banks so I don't think this proves the Federal Reserve is not a Central Bank.
Chinas Central Bank is also unlikely truly independent. Bank of England was nationalized in 1946 but in 1998 it became an independent public organization, wholly owned by the Treasury Solicitor on behalf of the government.
While your point is valid that the Federal Reserve is accountable to Congress monetary policy decisions are specifically exempt from GAO audits under the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act of 1978. I guess we will hear about this in future episodes.
This country has been pushing for such private control by the super wealthy for decades. They created the 1929 crash that sent the world into a tailspin for decades. The push back was ultimately a series of laws and banking regulations to prevent this form happening again. But there we were in 1989 with the S & L debacle enabled by the Bush coup and there we were in another international financial crash. The States such as Sweden and Japan put all their efforts into supporting the people and social institutions and came out of this crash in lightening speed but nt the US which refused to nationalize the banks and take control over them and their nefarious practices. We are again faced with this fascist takeover by the oligarchy pushing their wealth and power seeking at the expense of the general population which is about 90% of the people.
You cannot have a government controlled by the oligarchy, the superwealthy who want to rule the country as if it were a corporation run for the owner's profit and call it anything other than fascism!
Why is Elon Musk supporting Ron Paul leading an audit of The Federal Reserve such a big deal?
Because The Fed has NEVER had a full audit, or full disclosure of monetary policy decisions
Example: The Fed got caught doing HALF A TRILLION in swaps overseas with no oversight
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was even questioned about giving this half a trillion in swaps to the central banks overseas:
No one gave the approval and he says he doesn’t need approval, “We have a longstanding legal authority to do swaps with other central banks — It's not an emergency authority of any kind — Section 14 of the General Federal Reserve Act”
“Half a trillion dollars. And you don't know who got the money?”
This level of corruption is beyond comprehension and it’s been going on for decades.
Well, @johntitus said that ?" @23:32 ca... two different legal entities, what do you mean? Does that mean that the Norwegian people cannot audit the Norwegian Central Jew?
Like my comments proves: I CANT FUGGIN WAIT until the next episode, and the 7 next plus the bonus ones. there are so many questions that need answering. not just by us Leymans and Goims,
the bigger the picture get, the more perverse the puzzle gets :P
Good & Honorable Sir John, The following unknown historical facts should not surprise you:
1. With the passage of the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT in 1913, the US Congress "transferred" to that private corporation, "constructive legal possession" of all property, REAL & PERSONAL, within the territory of the United States, WITHOUT THERE BEING ANY DELIGATED POWER in the Constitution to do so. Recall that Jefferson succinctly stated, 'Federal powers are few and defined'. The clause "necessary and proper" is NOT defined!
2. WHEN.... the First National Bank of Tennesee went bankrupt in about 1980, the FED stepped in, exercising its claimed power, circled that bank with yellow tape, and encircled it with their private armed guards, who wore shoulder pads that said "FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM".
3. When an individual I personally knew for many years, who had accounts and a safety deposit box at the bank, went there to retrieve his property held there.......he was stopped by those armed FED guards, and informed he would not be permitted to do so. When he challenged the guards to give legal reason why he could not enter, the Captain of the FED GUARDS.. pointed in the direction of the bank and stated bluntly: "Every Think inside that bank belongs to us!"
4. WHEN, in about 1983, the FEDERAL RESERVE was personally sued in the Western District Court of Michigan, for running a sophisticated revenue gambling policy (Ponzi, if you will..) the FED's response as a DEFENDANT in that case, were as follows:
a. the FED is NOT the proper party
b. The Federal Reserve has.... SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY from such suits.
YOU READ THAT CORRECTLY! Then as NOW, the FEDERAL RESERVE claims SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY from all lawsuits ! Shall I state their claim in more succinct terms ? ? ? ? The Federal Reserve claimed the identical authority of KINGS ! The KING rules by DEVINE POWERS...and can DO NO WRONG.
THIS...is where we are today, in the 'Land of the Free and home of the brave."
For clarity. the King is bound by his Coronation Oath to do no wrong, meaning he cannot legally harm his Subjects. Whether that extends to Treaty, is a whole other question.
So looking forward this latest series John. Episode 1 already gave great intel and the format for the episodes ahead! So much going on with banking. As a former client of First Republic Bank here in Calif I watched that go down unnecessarily and scrambled to another local Bay Area bank here in NorCal, Sterling Bank. Their board voted to sell 12-18-24 to some criminals in Florida called EVERBANK which has a strong online presence I believe. Now, re-scrambling but the choices for strong local banks are getting thin here in Norcal. I wonder how much the moves being made at the Federal level is in order to line up retail banking to be principally on-line. Retail banking is a retail operation and we can see where stores in the retail sales arena are dropping like flies. Appreciate the explanation of the Fed. Memo issued by the brain dead former Pres. Wasn't aware of it. Keep up the great work!!
My intention was not to insinuate that companies with ties or home offices located in Florida State are bad and I apologize if that is how my commentary sounded. You are correct stating that criminals are those that are proven to be such, as in the case of HSBC, by court verdicts. After doing some further investigation into Everbank's structure, as regards to the Sterling purchase, by going into my local branch and discussing it with staff, it appears that branches will remain open in CA. My initial research seemed to show that the principle presence of Everbank would be on line. My feedback from visiting the branch is that jobs will be retained in CA and that many of the exec level positions in Calif will be retained by those currently staffing them. The bank appears to be a local bank to the Florida area. As they branch out West, I will be watching to see if the structure changes. The largest presence appears to planned for Southern Calif. Thanks for calling me out on this. I'll be doing more investigation, if I remain with the new bank. My principle disappointment was in losing a great more locally positioned bank, though Sterling's hq was not in CA, which was dedicating a focus and funds toward local development.
Thank you John. Very clearly presented, as usual. I learned a great deal in this first installment. You have a knack for cutting through the obfuscation. The complexity is always meant to confuse. Thank you for simplifying this.
Thank you. The writing is the hardest part, getting things down to the lowest common denominator.
“Give me control of a nation's money supply, and I care not who makes its laws.” - Mayer Amschel Rothschild
I'm sure you've read this before but I just have to repeat it because my belief that central banking is truly pernicious and evil. Debt is a four letter word and the work of the devil which should be used with extreme caution.
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money." (Said to be from an informal talk by Josiah Stamp at the University of Texas in the 1920s)
its the blood supply of the world... vampires in control
Backed and part of bloodline/aristocracy he schooled/educated and unleashed the furious five on first Europe. Nathan (England) and James (France) the loudest of the five.
Man, I love your stuff!! So informative and scary at the same time.
Thank you. My intent isn't to scare people but rather to wake up some while arming others with knowledge to back up their suspicions.
John, tell us WHY the politicians don't help us get rid of this curse, it is $, extortion, fear of assassination, allegiance to a secret society? This will help us know that the political system will never help us, which is what many of us believe.
It's our job to instill more fear into the pols than their paymasters do.
Thanks John, I'm sure you know there has to be more just than payments.
fwiw- in Bill Still's The Money Masters documentary (made in the late 90s), I'm pretty sure he said that most US politicians don't even understand the Federal Reserve and the monetary system. Dr Ron Paul was the only one who appeared on camera. I think there was one other congress person who understood, but was too afraid to be interviewed.
Some may not have known, most play dumb I’m sure. How hard is it to understand, “have the right to lend currency of no value and charge the principal and interest on it.”?
Honorable Author of BEST EVIDENCE,
There is so much more at risk here......... With CBDC's being promoted by the Fed, they are advocation for a select class of elites, exclusive and absolute control over the Right to Life of all Earth citizens. Further, a powerful Constitutional issue conflicts with the Fed's ultimate desires: RESTRAINT of TRADE. As I understand it, the Fed and World Banks desire to impose all electronic currency only, and will secure for them, free, unlimited access to the produced wealth of the People for ever, keeping them in power forever. What do you think, Good Sir? Kind Regards, FMR Intelligence Officer
"free, unlimited access to the produced wealth of the People for ever"
Sounds about right.
Because thats what they are stealing right? our combined produced labour?
we get paid in money so, thats my reasoning.
My reasoning is altso, Monero. Gold. Produce. NOT sell/deal to/with sionists.
Been awhile but nice to see you back. The Central Bank definition in the Federal Reserve Act is specific for Account Holders in Federal Reserve Banks so I don't think this proves the Federal Reserve is not a Central Bank.
Chinas Central Bank is also unlikely truly independent. Bank of England was nationalized in 1946 but in 1998 it became an independent public organization, wholly owned by the Treasury Solicitor on behalf of the government.
While your point is valid that the Federal Reserve is accountable to Congress monetary policy decisions are specifically exempt from GAO audits under the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act of 1978. I guess we will hear about this in future episodes.
Great conversation with James Corbett, thanks for the work you are doing.
Thank you so much for these videos & Substack posts man. They really are worth the wait...
well well looking fit. Your absence got me worried. Top work as always. THANK YOU
This country has been pushing for such private control by the super wealthy for decades. They created the 1929 crash that sent the world into a tailspin for decades. The push back was ultimately a series of laws and banking regulations to prevent this form happening again. But there we were in 1989 with the S & L debacle enabled by the Bush coup and there we were in another international financial crash. The States such as Sweden and Japan put all their efforts into supporting the people and social institutions and came out of this crash in lightening speed but nt the US which refused to nationalize the banks and take control over them and their nefarious practices. We are again faced with this fascist takeover by the oligarchy pushing their wealth and power seeking at the expense of the general population which is about 90% of the people.
You cannot have a government controlled by the oligarchy, the superwealthy who want to rule the country as if it were a corporation run for the owner's profit and call it anything other than fascism!
This looks The Business! Very clearly explained. Looking forward to Episode 2.
…see you on Money & Markets on Friday morning sharpish. Lots to hear about!
The tenant's lease on the money printing house has expired.
Congress should have them sign a new lease with the landlord, We The People, or get a new tenant.
Why is Elon Musk supporting Ron Paul leading an audit of The Federal Reserve such a big deal?
Because The Fed has NEVER had a full audit, or full disclosure of monetary policy decisions
Example: The Fed got caught doing HALF A TRILLION in swaps overseas with no oversight
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was even questioned about giving this half a trillion in swaps to the central banks overseas:
No one gave the approval and he says he doesn’t need approval, “We have a longstanding legal authority to do swaps with other central banks — It's not an emergency authority of any kind — Section 14 of the General Federal Reserve Act”
“Half a trillion dollars. And you don't know who got the money?”
This level of corruption is beyond comprehension and it’s been going on for decades.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1888583443962814811?s=46
Well, @johntitus said that ?" @23:32 ca... two different legal entities, what do you mean? Does that mean that the Norwegian people cannot audit the Norwegian Central Jew?
Like my comments proves: I CANT FUGGIN WAIT until the next episode, and the 7 next plus the bonus ones. there are so many questions that need answering. not just by us Leymans and Goims,
the bigger the picture get, the more perverse the puzzle gets :P
Good & Honorable Sir John, The following unknown historical facts should not surprise you:
1. With the passage of the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT in 1913, the US Congress "transferred" to that private corporation, "constructive legal possession" of all property, REAL & PERSONAL, within the territory of the United States, WITHOUT THERE BEING ANY DELIGATED POWER in the Constitution to do so. Recall that Jefferson succinctly stated, 'Federal powers are few and defined'. The clause "necessary and proper" is NOT defined!
2. WHEN.... the First National Bank of Tennesee went bankrupt in about 1980, the FED stepped in, exercising its claimed power, circled that bank with yellow tape, and encircled it with their private armed guards, who wore shoulder pads that said "FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM".
3. When an individual I personally knew for many years, who had accounts and a safety deposit box at the bank, went there to retrieve his property held there.......he was stopped by those armed FED guards, and informed he would not be permitted to do so. When he challenged the guards to give legal reason why he could not enter, the Captain of the FED GUARDS.. pointed in the direction of the bank and stated bluntly: "Every Think inside that bank belongs to us!"
4. WHEN, in about 1983, the FEDERAL RESERVE was personally sued in the Western District Court of Michigan, for running a sophisticated revenue gambling policy (Ponzi, if you will..) the FED's response as a DEFENDANT in that case, were as follows:
a. the FED is NOT the proper party
b. The Federal Reserve has.... SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY from such suits.
YOU READ THAT CORRECTLY! Then as NOW, the FEDERAL RESERVE claims SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY from all lawsuits ! Shall I state their claim in more succinct terms ? ? ? ? The Federal Reserve claimed the identical authority of KINGS ! The KING rules by DEVINE POWERS...and can DO NO WRONG.
THIS...is where we are today, in the 'Land of the Free and home of the brave."
Respectful, Appreciative & Kind Regards, Dave
For clarity. the King is bound by his Coronation Oath to do no wrong, meaning he cannot legally harm his Subjects. Whether that extends to Treaty, is a whole other question.
So looking forward this latest series John. Episode 1 already gave great intel and the format for the episodes ahead! So much going on with banking. As a former client of First Republic Bank here in Calif I watched that go down unnecessarily and scrambled to another local Bay Area bank here in NorCal, Sterling Bank. Their board voted to sell 12-18-24 to some criminals in Florida called EVERBANK which has a strong online presence I believe. Now, re-scrambling but the choices for strong local banks are getting thin here in Norcal. I wonder how much the moves being made at the Federal level is in order to line up retail banking to be principally on-line. Retail banking is a retail operation and we can see where stores in the retail sales arena are dropping like flies. Appreciate the explanation of the Fed. Memo issued by the brain dead former Pres. Wasn't aware of it. Keep up the great work!!
Thanks for the intel re First Republic/Everbank. Very interesting.
My intention was not to insinuate that companies with ties or home offices located in Florida State are bad and I apologize if that is how my commentary sounded. You are correct stating that criminals are those that are proven to be such, as in the case of HSBC, by court verdicts. After doing some further investigation into Everbank's structure, as regards to the Sterling purchase, by going into my local branch and discussing it with staff, it appears that branches will remain open in CA. My initial research seemed to show that the principle presence of Everbank would be on line. My feedback from visiting the branch is that jobs will be retained in CA and that many of the exec level positions in Calif will be retained by those currently staffing them. The bank appears to be a local bank to the Florida area. As they branch out West, I will be watching to see if the structure changes. The largest presence appears to planned for Southern Calif. Thanks for calling me out on this. I'll be doing more investigation, if I remain with the new bank. My principle disappointment was in losing a great more locally positioned bank, though Sterling's hq was not in CA, which was dedicating a focus and funds toward local development.
Thank you John